Long story short; because of a cash shortage I don't have a bike. Never had, and I am now on my Ps after passing the MOST on a hire bike. I've now started saving for a machine again, but it looks like I won't get there (barring a lotto win) until next year when my Ps will have finished. Sooooo, this means I could shop for a non-LAMS bike, and the Hornet 600 keeps coming up. What I can't get passed, however, is how cheap they usually are. Why? They seem like great bikes from what many say, and if they are a step up from the CB400 (which I have ridden a number of times) they seem perfect for me; naked, reasonably powerful, reliable. Can anyone explain why Hornets appear to be so undervalued?