This is in regards to owning a commuting bike and a weekend bike. Are you actually better off owning a $7k bike for commuting and a $20k+ bike for weekend use only versus just a $20k+ bike that is used for both? My numbers are very rough but I figure a $7k bike will set me back roughly $1.3k/yr for rego, 3rd party property (not comprehensive) and depreciation. A $20k bike will set me back maybe $4.5k for the same items giving a total of $5.7k for the 2 bikes. If I had just the $20k bike I would figure the rego, insurance and higher depreciation due to more kms to come in around $5k. The depreciation is something Iâ€™m not exactly sure how to factor in, nor the effect 40,000kms will have when I try to sell a $20k bike 2yrs later for $14k. Is a $20k - $14k drop over 2 yrs for that amount of kms to little? Would I expect to lose more? I prefer to buy only 1 bike if I can rather than 2 as I will have to cram 3 bikes and a car into my garage. I'd appreciate any input you guys could give me so i can make the right decision.