I'm gonna ask about my specific situation here, but I hope this can spread out into a broader discussion of the issue with some more general suggestions. (Which is why I'm starting it in General Discussion, but if the mods in ther wisdom decide to move it that's cool with me.) I'm looking at two YZF600s, with prices is the same ballpark. One is a 95 that's done 50,000 kms, the other is a 97 that's done 75,000. Any suggestions in general about whether a newer bike with (a reasonable number) more km on the clock is better than an older one with less? With the YZF it's a little more complicated because it had a pretty big revision in 97 with the addition of ram air, a different fairing shape and so on.