Welcome to Netrider ... Connecting Riders!

Interested in talking motorbikes with a terrific community of riders?
Signup (it's quick and free) to join the discussions and access the full suite of tools and information that Netrider has to offer.

A Triumph Daytona 675 review

Discussion in 'Bike Reviews, Questions and Suggestions' at netrider.net.au started by [FLUX], Aug 9, 2007.

  1. I've been locked in a small room, dragging myself around the house nursing a broken ankle and wrist for the last three months. Through it all I sat whistfuilly looking outside at the darkening gloom of winter with dark clouds hanging like steel wool in the sky, rain heavy enough to break a ten year drought, and gusting icy winds with a chill factor low enough to freeze a small unprotected infant solid in minutes. It was almost enough to make me feel like it wasn't so bad that I was unable to easily venture into nature's wintry embrace, but the call of the outdoors is not so easily ignored. Whether the inability or unwillingness to venture outside is forced upon you, voluntarily endured, or involuntarily suffered, it still feels like a prison sentence. The rare moments when the golden sun weakly breaks through the gloom just makes it all the more stifling. I'd been working hard on healing, and working hard on my job, burning many a midnight candle, staring through the small window on the outside world that is my computer monitor. Lucky for me, I guess, that my job involves telecommuting so I don't have to leave the house to work, but that is a mixed blessing. One's world also becomes a lot smaller, more confined.

    A few weeks ago the shackles were loosened slightly as I regained mobility with the ability to walk again, albeit slowly and painfully. Strength and mobility rapidly returned with use though, and it wasn't long before I was eyeing off new motorbikes with more than a wishful sigh. Riding once again was becoming a rapidly approaching reality, and it was time to go bike hunting for a new steed. I desired a bike that was light, that handled well, steered with impeccably nimble precision like a well setup 250cc race-rep, but with gobs of mid-range grunt and a linear power delivery that makes for effortless cornering and the ability to wind on the throttle early mid-corner with confidence and without surprises. I wanted a bike that stirred something deep inside me whenever I looked at its curves and shape. Did such a bike exist? Small, light, powerful, agile, grunty, and good looking.

    It seemed to me that the class of bikes that best had the hope of meeting my requirements would be something in the super-sport range, or perhaps a larger minimalistic vee-two. I had concerns about how most 600cc-class bike manufacturers are robbing real-world usable mid-range to feed the power-hungry top-end monster that is the highly competitive super-sport racing scene. In recent times the real-world friendly and eminently streetable mid-range power of the perenially popular super-sport class has been all-too willingly sacrificed at the altar of the winner's dais by most major bike manufacturers. Now, more than ever, a super-sport machine is really just a lightly modified peaky race-bike with token, easily discarded, lights and mirrors necessary for road registration by law. I had no desire for such a bike. I also desired a bike that stirred the soul at a level which the Japanese manufacturers always seem to exorcise out of their motorcycles with their ruthlessly efficient engineering.

    I already had a short-list of desired bikes that I thought might best suit my desires, and the Triumph Daytona 675 headed that list, with my only real concerns being about rider comfort in relation to my still healing wrist injury as sports bikes are not known to be particularly kind on the wrists, and my fears about the aforementioned super-sport midrange heists being perpertrated by manufacturers. The only way to be sure would be to take one for a test-ride, so it was off to the nearest Triumph dealer to arrange a meeting with destiny. A few days later I was called in on a sunny day to be presented with a shiny red Triumph Daytona 675 test-bike, and after some initial calming of the nerves, fired the bike up and was off. The bike had completely shagged tyres, but I could straight away tell how nimble and light it was. Comfort was good for the wirst, a definite plus. The mid-range? Wow! This thing pulled hard like a litre bike, and the rorting roar emanating from the air-box every time the throttle was opened sent chills of aural excitement down my spine. This look, sound and character of the bike stirred the soul in a way which I haven't felt in years of riding Japanese made bikes. The test ride was all too short, consisting mostly of a few city streets and a short highway stretch, and as I reluctantly handed the keys back, I thanked the dealer for their time, playing it as cool as I could muster.

    Researching online from the confines of my prison once again, I discovered that the 675 was available in black, and after becoming entranced by the beauty of its form in this paint scheme from viewing various pctures, I knew that I'd been hooked. This wasn't just a motorbike. It was an incarnate physical manifestation of my motorcycling desire. A few phone calls later, and I had a black Triumph Daytona 675 waiting for me to take delivery of. A careful ride home with those wintry steel woollen clouds threatening saw me waiting impatiently for the next four days for work and weather to coincide to allow me the circumstance to safely partake in the pleasure of experiencing my new muse. Yesterday was that day!

    Fired up the satin black beauty in the garage, allowing it to warm up fully while completing the ritual of gearing up properly for the ride. Jump aboard and we're off for our first real ride. The destination is Arthur's Seat. As I peel into the first few corners near home, I'm immediately struck with how the bike just wants to follow my head. I just have to think that I want to go around the corner and it's like the bike is reading my mind, taking its cues off the subtlest of body movements, and the gentlest of pushes on the clip-ons, and it's leaning and driving through the corner. Almost uncanny. Head through a few roundabouts and it's like my hands are directly on the road guiding the direction of the bike, such is the responsiveness. This is such a stark contrast to my old Yamaha R1. The R1 was modified for track use, and had a steepened and aggressively quick steering angle and barring really high speed work, it was not a difficult bike to get turning by any stretch of the imagination, and yet the Daytona 675 makes the R1 feel like an imbalanced cudgel in comparison.

    As for the motor, it had huge dolloping gobs of midrange torque everywhere. It was also silky smooth in comparison to the old buzzing R1. The 675 just pulled cleanly from 3000rpm upwards, even in sixth gear! Heck, I wasn't missing the R1's strong mid-range at all! From 4000rpm onwards it got urgent - where any quick flick of the throttle in the lower four gears results in a good arm yanking. What was just so utterly deceptive about all of it though was that there are no real surges or steps to the power delivery. The motor is about the closest thing to an internal combustion engined electric motor. Once again, whenever the throttle was cracked, that delicious roar snorted out of the airbox, into my ears and down my spine. This bike makes the run-in phase easy: you always want to keep on varying the engine speed, slowing down, and opening up the throttle again just to hear that edgy chilling roar.

    It's not all good news though. I often found myself riding around wondering just why the heck was everyone else going so damn slow! I'd then look down and with a shock I'd realise that it wasn't they were who going particularly slow at all. The super smooth linear engine provides no real aural or tactile feedback as to just how fast you're travelling, or at least, I'm not yet accustomed to the feedback that it's giving me and relating that to an actual speed. The last time I was on a bike it was on the race-track, where speedometers don't matter, but I can see that I need to very quickly get back into the habit of studious speedometer watching if I want to keep that magical green and white card firmly ensconced in my wallet.

    Setting up and peeling into the sweepers up the back of Arthur's Seat had me cutting deliciously accurate arcs, dissecting the bitumen on a whim, and in a brief encounter with a local hoon, left him gaping and slackjawed as I sailed effortlessly by along a short straight between sweepers. Winding open the throttle, albeit being careful not to rev the engine too heavily or hard during the early stages of the run-in process, resulted in a relentless linear surge towards the scenery that was now rushing up at an alarmingly rapid rate. A glance down at the speedometer once again confirmed, with a moderate dose of shocked realisation, that one's perception of speed on the bike resides in an alternate reality somewhere other than the reality in which we typically reside. Squeezing the right lever brought another pleasant surprise. My old R1 was noted for having some of the best brakes ever fitted to a production bike in its day, but the 675's brakes out-shone the R1 in almost every way, hauling the bike up extremely quickly and with minimal effort. In fact, I'd say that they were a touch too good on the initial bite. My personal preference is for my brakes to quickly ease in a touch before grabbing hard to allow for a gentler weight transfer onto the front tyre, but the 675's brakes work so well they'd put you over the handlerbars in an instant with a strong index finger squeeze alone.

    The trip home was just as enjoyable, playing with the throttle, enjoying the sounds, getting yanked towards the horizon, and thought control steering. This is a bike built for those who like to carve up corners. The seat is very firm, as is the suspension, but coming from an aggressive road riding and track-day back-ground, that suits me just fine. The suspension feels better the faster you go. The rear end is a little stiff, and I've already ordered a replacement rear shock for it, which should arrive at about the time that I've completed the run-in period.

    At the end of the ride, I arrived home feeling more energated that I have in months, and in a distinctly better mood than when I left. Yes. This bike is my motorcycling muse.
  2. so you liked it then? :LOL:

    Great write up mate.
  3. You really do delight in torchering all of us who don't have a 675 don't you :grin:
  4. Yes, stop torturing us!
  5. :grin: Not at all. I was just inspired, and felt like waxing lyrical about it. :cool:
  6. Yeah, was a nice write up, but no short story is complete without pictures!
  7. Have to agree :worthlesspics:

    Well maybe worthless is going to far, but you can never have enough pics of 675s :grin:
  8. Some selected pics of it sitting in my back yard. I forgot to take the camera to grab some snaps at the top of Arthur's Seat. In hind-sight, I should have, eh?



    More pics here
  9. I reckon it'd be a good thing to organise a (Vic?) 675 riders ride one day. I managed to get 3 together a while ago from triumph675.net but I'd dearly love to see 10+ riding together, now that would be a sight! (dreaming dreaming dreaming)
  10. Great write-up, Flux. Well worth the read :)

    Definitely food for thought :-k :grin:
  11. sigh...59 days to go but i stupidley decided to grow up and buy a house ! The local triumph dealer and I have been on first name basis for almost a year as I go in every week or so to see if my 675's are still waiting for me to get off restricted...now I gotta work out how I am gonn afford it and the house!....sigh :( Great write up BTW
  12. damn she looks sweet
  13. First time i saw the 675 i thought, thats the bike for me. Since then ive been looking around and studying different bikes, but reading reviews and seeing some more pics again, theres a good chance i might be an owner one day. But a zx is pretty sexy too! :D
  14. Congrats on the new toy and your renewed freedom on two wheels!
    By the sounds of your schpeel you reeeeally like this 675, and i must say in the black it does look like quite a mean little machine.
    Planning to modify those Yamaha blue leathers to match the black little devil?
    Aside from the rear shock, any other planned mods in the short term?
    Gonna get the full suspension works done on it?
    Whats with the red rear cowl?
    I know it might be a little too soon but i'm sure you've thought about it... any idea on when your going to take it to the Island? :wink:

    Yes, i'm full of questions!
  15. The pants were fairly badly damaged, so they're gone now. They did their job perfectly though. I didn't have a single scratch or graze on my body after the accident. Only a couple of very light bruises. The jacket is still okay, but as I was losing weight it had already started to get a little baggy. I'll be on the market for some new leathers once I get my weight down another 15kgs or so.

    Full plans are (over the next year):

    Wilbers Sports Shock Absorber on the rear
    Andreani Valving on the front (what I had on the R1 - fantastic valves!)
    Leo Vince Exhaust
    TuneBoy Map Kit
    BMC Filter
    Custom Decal Set (essentially replace gold decals with red decals)
    Black Pazzo levers
    Black bar ends with red color highlight
    Black anodise the pegs+pedals
    Black powder coat the rims

    Coupled with the above mods, it'll all make sense.

    I've been banned from the racetrack for the immediate foreseeable future. :cry:

    BTW: If anyone feels that the above review is worthy to be linked to in this thread, then please feel free to nominate it in that thread. FalconLord seems to reckon that my review wasn't worthy of being linked to in his thread, but would be willing to change his mind if people nominated it.
  16. Awesome bike, enjoy it and be safe!
  17. I was bored, and sat down with a calculator and some dyno graphs, and tried to see if the numbers explained my seat of the pants feelings about me not missing the R1's mid-range at all.

    I plotted roll-on 3rd gear power to the ground from 50kph to 160kph, adjusting for the different wet weights + rider weight (gearing was of-course taken into account) between my bone stock D675 and my old 2000 model R1 with a Yoshi pipe on it, and determined how much accelerative force was being applied at any given speed.

    At 50kph, the 675 should actually get a bit of a jump on the R1 by a bike-length or so. The 675 then has a bit of a dip in the torque curve at 80kph, and the R1 should make up most of the initial lost ground, but by 100kph the two bikes are accelerating just as hard as each other, and it remains that way all the way up to 140kph at which time the R1 would then slowly start to pull away, possibly gaining a bike length by 160kph. Beyond 160kph the R1 would start to get into its own territory and pull away fairly quickly while the 675 needs to change up to 4th.

    That's comparing a bone-stock D675 to a modified 2000 model R1, which is actually known for having a stronger midrange pickup between 60-180kph than any of the more modern litre bikes. Past 180kph the more modern litre bikes will kick the old R1's butt, but up to that point the old beast held its ground really well.

    With power everywhere like that, I reckon the 675 does ask the serious question of just why people need a litre bike as a road bike? For me, I'm glad to know that I wasn't going crazy in thinking that the 675 pulls as hard as a litre bike, and up until you get to crazy sorts of speeds for the public road it holds its own just fine.

    It is just such a well balanced complete package.
  18. I'll take your word on that one. Looking forward to seeing it. :D

    So was that by the Minister for Finance, Social Planning & Family Preservation or was that by the actual track? :?: :shock:
  19. How come it took you so long to come to that conclusion? I've been saying that for years (& getting shot down for it every single time :) ) Combine 50-60hp with light weight and half decent handling & you're on a winner for actual typical road riding :)
  20. Eh? I've been saying it for quite a while now too (~12 months at least after doing a quick search), although I've never actually owned a 50-60hp bike, so I didn't really have a good frame of reference to compare it to. It wasn't until I got the camera on the bike which showed me the engine speed I was sitting at, coupled with some dyno graphs, that I became fullly aware that I wasn't using more than around 50hp at any time.

    Then, after a track day on the track with Pomy Boy, and myself, both having trouble getting past Adam Cole on his ~50hp 1960's era Matchless that weighed next to nothing, it started to twig to me that heck, a lot of hp doesn't even mean that much at a track like Phillip Island, and that old bike sure handled damn well 'cos it was so light.

    Hope you don't think it was me shooting you down. I may have been against peaky bikes with a crap midrange for purposes of road riding, but that wouldn't been about the extent that I would've disagreed about anything.

    Having said all that, having at least 100rwhp on tap is just "nice to have". Sure might not ever use it more than 1% of the time, but it's nice to have it when you want it, especially on steeper up-hill sections.

    In any event, you should be happy that you've got one more ally who's willing to back you up when you say that anything much more than 50-60hp is not really needed.