1. Welcome to Netrider ... Connecting Riders!


    You appear to be browsing Netrider.net.au as a guest user. Did you know that if you sign up with an account, you get access to all kinds of additional privileges, and are then able to join the discussions? You will also be able to tap into the full suite of tools and information that Netrider has to offer.


    Already a member? Login Now

Canon 1D X, specs and review

Discussion in 'Non-Bikes' started by Morbo28, Oct 19, 2011.

  1.  
    Morbo28

    Morbo28 404 - Title not found. Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,795
    Location:
    Hawthorn
    The specs of the 1D X have officially been released.
    eg: http://www.dpreview.com/news/1110/11101810canoneos1dx.asp

    Everyone is putting their two bob in. They are pretty impressive stats.

    Check out the initial impression from Burrard-Lucas (wildlife photographers).

    http://blog.burrard-lucas.com/reviews/canon-eos-1d-x-review/



    If someone plays with one, whack up a thread, huh.... :)
  2.  
    Unconnected
    Spaced

    Unconnected Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2010
    Messages:
    2,095
    Location:
    Sydney - Cremorne
    Motorbike(s):
    1988 VFR400R
    Ugh "it's been extensively reworked (it includes more professional video features than any other Canon DSLR"

    Here is a tip canon. I buy cameras to take photos, not to shoot movies. If i wanted to shoot a movie, i would buy a video camera, that is why both of these products exist.

    Honestly its ****ing stupid, i would much rather see the R&D work go into making the camera take better photos, because it is at the end of the day a camera.

    Think about where we could be now if canon had not spent the last few years developing video mode and instead developed better cameras. ****ing waste of time.
  3.  
    Morbo28

    Morbo28 404 - Title not found. Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,795
    Location:
    Hawthorn
    Yeah I agree to some extent - I want a high quality camera first and foremost.

    The sheer size of the 1 series means the 5 series continues to be a better option for me...not to mention the price.
  4.  
    smee
    Spaced

    smee MODERATOR: Devil's Advocate Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2003
    Messages:
    11,413
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Motorbike(s):
    1998 BMW R1100 S
    You do realise they are shooting more tv series and some movies using those same cameras you are shitcanning.
  5.  
    Morbo28

    Morbo28 404 - Title not found. Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,795
    Location:
    Hawthorn
  6.  
    Morbo28

    Morbo28 404 - Title not found. Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,795
    Location:
    Hawthorn
    Yeah my mate had her film clip done on a 5D...looks amazing!
  7.  
    Morbo28

    Morbo28 404 - Title not found. Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,795
    Location:
    Hawthorn
    "Some sample photos I saw from a pre-production model that were shot at ISO 25,600 were ridiculously, ridiculously clean."
  8.  
    Unconnected
    Spaced

    Unconnected Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2010
    Messages:
    2,095
    Location:
    Sydney - Cremorne
    Motorbike(s):
    1988 VFR400R
    Im very aware that lots of indi film makers use them to make movies because they dont give the film a 'handy cam' look.

    But still, this is canons top photograpic offering for ultra professional photographers. Its beyond the reach of most indi film makers etc and canon already produce the 60D which is very much geared towards film making with its flipy out lcd screen and such.

    The extra R&D budget freed up by the lack of a video mode which most will never use on the 1D could have been used to improve the features that matter the most to the majority of the customers of the 1Dx.
  9.  
    TRA

    TRA

    I spotted some corporate guys using canon DSLR's for filming a few months back.

    Estimated price is USD$6800, not quite as expensive as I though it would be.
  10.  
    smee
    Spaced

    smee MODERATOR: Devil's Advocate Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2003
    Messages:
    11,413
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Motorbike(s):
    1998 BMW R1100 S
    Indi filmakers?????
    House is filmed now using 5d mark 2's as are some other major tv series as well as some major hollywood movies in parts.
    As for features the "majority of customers" want what would they be?
    Not bagging you I'm just wondering why.
  11.  
    Unconnected
    Spaced

    Unconnected Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2010
    Messages:
    2,095
    Location:
    Sydney - Cremorne
    Motorbike(s):
    1988 VFR400R
    Every dollar spent developing video mode is a dollar taken away from developing Photo mode. Thats what i mean, i do not work in canon R&D and hence cannot come up with interesting new features for the camera, thats not really what i was trying to say.
  12.  
    smee
    Spaced

    smee MODERATOR: Devil's Advocate Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2003
    Messages:
    11,413
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Motorbike(s):
    1998 BMW R1100 S
    Well what are you trying to say?
    It's a damned good camera that seems to do EVERYTHING well.
  13.  
    goz
    Busy

    goz ModRider Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2008
    Messages:
    8,997
    Location:
    Sydney
    Motorbike(s):
    Bikeless
    A phone was just a phone once, wait till u start making phone calls from your 1D :)
  14.  
    Rolkus
    Amazed

    Rolkus Photographer. Premium Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2011
    Messages:
    533
    Location:
    Wyndham Vale, VIC
    Motorbike(s):
    Suzuki DRZ-400SM, 08 KTM 990 Superduke R
    Smee ias right.


    I originally bought a 7D just for filming. It takes full resolution video at a fraction of the cost of a decent video camera.

    Heck, they use them for stuff like http://t.co/4mYPPA3w (shot by a friend on a 5DMKII). Canon has this market now and they're doing the right thing by supporting it.

    Altho, I don't get why you'd need an ISO that high.
  15.  
    Morbo28

    Morbo28 404 - Title not found. Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,795
    Location:
    Hawthorn
    Plenty of reasons - low light shooting, ability to shoot at much migher shutter speeds. The fact that the sensor itself has a wider range of sensitivities utilise.

    The main thing I want from the camera is a great DSLR. But the video is deifnitiely a bonus. And if that brings in extra sales which mean extra $$ which means extra R&D then it's no bad thing, as long as it doesn't turn into a 'jack of all trades, master of none' typoe deal.

    As long as the video features dont compromise the still photography ability it's all good IMO.
  16.  
    ZRX1200R
    Breezy

    ZRX1200R Premium Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2004
    Messages:
    3,764
    Location:
    Castlemaine
    Motorbike(s):
    Harley Davidson FLD, Kawasaki KLR650.
    That's true but video and still photography have differing requirements and I strongly suspect that no matter how good the still abilities are that they are at least slightly compromised by the video abilities.

    For example the new 1D X has reduced the number of pixels and maintained (or slightly improved) the low light performance compared to earlier full frame Canons, they could have chosen to improve the low ISO performance whilst keeping the pixel count similar to the earlier model by implementing the new technology but they went further and reduced the pixel count.

    One has to wonder how much of this choice was driven by the requirements of those using such cameras primarily for video rather than still photography.
  17.  
    Morbo28

    Morbo28 404 - Title not found. Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,795
    Location:
    Hawthorn
    All fair points. Though in the low-light example, it doesn't look like the low light performance has suffered:

  18.  
    Rolkus
    Amazed

    Rolkus Photographer. Premium Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2011
    Messages:
    533
    Location:
    Wyndham Vale, VIC
    Motorbike(s):
    Suzuki DRZ-400SM, 08 KTM 990 Superduke R
    I suppose I would need to see a photo or footage shot at such a high iso to believe how clean they are. Heck, my camera doesnt go above 640.
  19.  
    TRA

    TRA

    Increasing pixel size, means that the pixel is more sensitive and can pick up more light, hence improving low light sensitivity. It has nothing to do with video capabilities of the camera what so ever. I would guess the requirement has been driven by those whanting better ISO performance, combined with high frame rate from a full frame rate sensor. Great for sports photogrpahers and people shooting with large telephoto lenses in low light. If you want high pixel counts then consider a medium format camera.

    The camera is a still camera, however because of the design it can also be used as video camera without compromising the still features. All it requires is a little more code in the firmware to route data from the CCD to the flash card. I dont understand how people think this can affect the still performance.

    If you seriously think that canon is going to compromise the performance of its top end DSLR still performance you are clearly delusional.
  20.  
    Unconnected
    Spaced

    Unconnected Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2010
    Messages:
    2,095
    Location:
    Sydney - Cremorne
    Motorbike(s):
    1988 VFR400R
    Really? i have a 7D as well and i find that its more then fine up to 1000 and even higher with a bit of post processing. Sure at 100% you will notice the noise at 1000, but how often do you show 18mp photos at 100% to people?

Share This Page